H.-J. Bannier, Pomologen-Verein, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany Translated by Reinhard Schomberg-Klee (Göttingen) and Nigel Deacon (Leicester).
COPYRIGHT DECLARATION This English translation from the German is ©Reinhard Schomberg-Klee and Nigel Deacon.
March 11, 2014
Leave a Comment
January 23, 2014
Leave a Comment
Currently we grow about 30 varieties of apples in our orchard. Over the last two years we have grafted several more varieties (about 50) that we have received scion wood from collectors and will offer for sale in the near future. Many of these we have field planted to grow up to size. However we don’t have a lot more room to devote to planting fruit trees therefore our decision was to container grow these.
Scion wood is 1 year growth from a specific variety of fruit tree. The small twig or branch portion usually has 3 or 4 buds and is grafted onto an appropriate rootstock. Commercial tree growers that grow young trees for fruit farmers to plant, generally keep what is called a “mother block”. This is an orchard that the trees are pruned to maximize branching and twiggy growth so that the largest number of scions can be cut and grafted to become new trees each year. These are pruned to make wood and not fruit. Several hundred scions can be cut from a single tree and many of these big growers may just have one or a few of each variety which they use to make hundreds or thousands of new trees yearly. The picture shows a mother tree after dormant pruning. In the mother block trees can be planted closer than normal since no fruit is desired and usually fertilized higher than normal with nitrogen to promote vegetative growth.
In our new scion nursery we chose to plant semi-dwarf instead of dwarf as would be normal for container growing. We felt SD rootstock would give more and faster top growth. Add to that the natural dwarfing by container growing and heavy pruning should work better for our purpose. Of course we don’t want to prune as heavy as the big guys since we also want fruit from these! Container growing also eliminates weed competition and gives greater control of nutrient use. It also allows us to leave lower branches since the trees are elevated about 2′ above ground level.
This Saturday was warm with low wind, a rarity for this time of year. The guys started by lining up railroad ties. This protects a faucet and drain that each year gets run over by cars plus will help hold the bark chips we will add around the containers. After that they centered the 25 gal. cans at 48” in 2 rows alternating for better sunlight penetration and air circulation. While this is close spacing, the benefit of container growing is they can be spread apart if more space is needed.
Trees were dug one at a time from our field planting. We chose to leave some native soil on the roots to protect them from drying out during transplanting and also to inoculate the pots with the mycorrhizal fungus that is so important to the root’s ability to absorb nutrients.
The trees were then planted and new tags applied. Along with that we made a map of their order which will be entered into our computer records. Mapping your plantings and saving to disk is invaluable when tags disappear or fade and when your memory disappears or fades also!
We were able to get 19 trees planted with this load of soil mix or about 12 per cubic yard. After the planting was completed we then went back and applied a 1” layer of composted and aged goat manure. Goat manure, while not as readily available here as horse manure, is better because the multiple stomachs of a goat digest weed seeds better than a horse’s single stomach. Also the nutrient profile is a little better for plants.
We have room in this area for about 30 trees and will finish planting with the next good weather . After that we will fill the area with wood chips to stop weeds, add drip irrigation and mulch the trees. We have also gathered log rounds to use as stepping stones to get through on the west side. At this point we have preserved and worked around the native trees and will probably need to do some summer pruning on them. We also helped to define a loading and parking area for customer pick ups on the east side with the use of the railroad ties.
January 19, 2014
Most people will want to sample their garden or orchard area and these guidelines are for small areas
Soil Sampling Instructions.
1. Several different tools – such as an auger, a soil sampling tube, or a spade may be used in taking soil samples.
2. Scrape away surface litter. If an auger or soil sampling tube is used, obtain a small portion of soil by making a boring about 7 inches deep, or if plowing or tilling deeper, sample to tillage depth. If a tool such as a spade is used, dig a V-shaped hole to sample depth; then cut a thin slice of soil from one side of the hole.
3. Avoid areas or conditions that are different, such as areas where fertilizer or liming materials have been spilled, gate areas where livestock have congregated, poorly drained areas, dead furrows, tillage or fertilizer corners, or fertilizer band areas of last year’s crop. Only sample growing areas, not roads or other areas of activity.
4. Because of soil variations, it is necessary that each sample consist of small portions of soil obtained from approximately 6-8 locations in the soil area. After obtaining these portions of soil, mix them together for a representative sample. Dry samples and place 16 oz. (2 cups) of soil in a soil sample bag or Zip Loc bag.
5. Soil sample depth is dependent on crop type. Our vegetable garden, since shallow rooted, is sampled at 5”, berries 6” and trees 8-10” since these depths are more indicative of the root growing zone.
6. It is important to not contaminate the samples by allowing surface debris or soil to fall into the hole where samples are gathered.
Types of Sample testing can be customized to give you results in lbs per acre, lbs per 1,000 sq ft, parts per million, Kilograms per hectare. We find lbs per 1K sq ft the easiest to work with. If I were testing a 40 acre field I would use the pounds per acre.
Standard Soil Test:
This test will show Ph, major minerals, minor minerals and some trace elements, total exchange capacity and organic matter content. Note this differs from the basic NPK test offered by some state ag colleges because of the type test we request and use. This will show you the total content in your sample.
Paste Soil Test:
The saturated paste test shows what nutrients are immediately available in the soil’s water solution. These are the easy access nutrients for plants, so this test better predicts what nutrients (and how many) will get into the plant. This will show ph, major and minor minerals and their availability.
What is the real difference in the two tests? The easiest way to think of it is the standard test as the soil’s “savings account” and the saturated paste test as the soil’s “checking account”. Both show nutrients that are accessible, but the checking account nutrients are more easily available.
An example we have is that each spring we face iron chlorosis in strawberries. Iron chlorosis is a yellowing of plant leaves caused by iron deficiency. It frequently occurs in soils that are alkaline (pH greater than 7.0) and that contain lime; conditions that are common in New Mexico. Even though we have plenty of iron in our soil, the high soil pH causes chemical reactions that make the iron solid and unavailable to plant roots. Such iron will be tied up indefinitely unless soil conditions change to lower the ph.
I recommend doing both tests to give a bigger picture, but if you can only do one then a Paste test will give you items to work on immediately.
These are the basic tests we use. Of course you can go more I depth and get particulate type tests showing percent of clay, sand, loam and organic matter or individual tests for specific minerals. Before I do those I would get a quality water test. It stands to reason, for example, if you are trying to lower your soil ph but constantly adding high ph irrigation water that you need to calculate this into your equations.
January 13, 2014
One of our farm goals is to produce the healthiest and most nutritious food we can for our families. This is one of the reasons we chose to apply and become USDA Certified Organic. But does this certification mean our fruits, berries and vegetables are healthier and more nutrient dense than those raised by conventional means? I think the answer is both yes and no. In terms of “healthy” there is no doubt that foods grown without conventional pesticides, herbicides and chemical fertilizers are “healthier” for you. In terms of nutrition though, that can be debatable. It stands to reason that a crop grown organically on poor, nutrient deficient soil will not provide more vitamins, minerals etc. than a conventionally grown crop in soil that is more complete in minerals and micro biotic life.
The foundation of “Organics” is building a healthier, more balanced soil and to that end I think the average crop grown on organic soil will be more nutritious than those grown conventionally. Remember that organic production does not guarantee good soil building. I know of one large organic farm that I toured a few years ago that had no real soil building program. When I asked what they did to increase fertility, their answer was to add blood meal between crop cycles. Blood meal is an organic approved source of nitrogen but very little else. In essence they were just adding a shot of nitrogen to cover the reason that their crops were not as good as they should be. In my opinion this is not soil building, it is conventional growing substituting “organic” nitrogen for chemically derived nitrogen.
The modern “Organic’ movement has three large groups or methods within it and all are approved by USDA. The most notable is the method following the Rodale principles of organic growing developed and refined by J. I. Rodale. This utilizes an emphasis on compost, crop rotation and cover cropping (or green manures) to improve soil quality. Another branch is the group which promotes optimal mineralization developed by William Albrecht. It seeks that optimal nutrition is based primarily on ratios of minerals and quantity of these including trace elements. Restoring a balance in these and that excesses can be as bad as deficiencies. The third is the BioDynamic movement. Methods unique to the biodynamic approach include its treatment of animals, crops, and soil as a single system; an emphasis from its beginnings on local production and distribution systems; its use of traditional and development of new local breeds and varieties; and the use of an astrological sowing and planting calendar. Biodynamic agriculture uses various herbal and mineral additives for compost additives and field sprays; these are sometimes prepared by controversial methods, such as burying ground quartz stuffed into the horn of a cow, which are said to harvest “cosmic forces in the soil”, that are more akin to sympathetic magic than agronomy.
There are as many facets to organic growing as there are farmers. Many gardeners both amateur and professional combine parts of all of these methods and also utilize others such as no-till farming and carbon restoration by use of bio-char. Our approach and philosophies combine some of both Rodale and Albrecht practices. While Rodale promotes compost as a panacea, we feel this isn’t enough. If your location is deficient in something, using on-farm generated compost will just perpetuate the situation. It may benefit soil tilth and microbial activity and this may improve your growth, but not make your food more nutritious.
We know where we want to end up: with the best soil and most complete balance of major, minor and trace elements possible combined with the correct microbes to utilize and convert these elements to plant useable products. But how do we get there? First you must know where you are before you can map directions to your destinantion. If you want to end up in New York, it is almost impossible to get there if you don’t know where you are to start with. Go north, east, west, south? Closed roads, washed out bridges, construction etc. What to do? Any approach you take is just a guess and any solutions you add will be just luck if they get you there. So logic dictates we must first determine where we are and this is one of the purposes of a soil test. Continued …….
September 4, 2013
Only $8.00 each
SeaBerry is widely used for healing in Asia and Europe, where it is valued as a potent anti-oxidant, a source for Vitamin C and healing oil. The attractive small tree or shrub, also called Sea Buckthorn is likely the most widely grown, northern hardy, fruiting plant in the world, but most Americans have never heard of it! In Europe, the sour, flavorful fruit is sweetened and its orange-passion-fruit-like flavor makes fine sauces, jellies and a base for liqueurs. Blended with other fruits, it makes a delicious juice. The plants, native to the Russian Far East, are incredibly productive and a great choice for backyard fruit production. Narrow silver leaves and plentiful round, yellow-orange fruit cover the 6-10′ tall, narrow, upright female forms. As one of the “SuperFruits” this variety is Leikora which is higher in vitamin C. Give plants full sun and good drainage, and space them about 7′ apart or 3-5′ for a hedge or an effective fruiting windbreak. They are extremely hardy, to -50° F., disease resistant and easy to grow. Branches are used in floral displays, and commercial crops are harvested by cutting off entire fruit-laden branches. Perfect for New Mexico they are drought tolerant and like full sun. One male needed for about every 8 female plants. 1 gallon 12” size
Our normal price is $20.00 each or 3 for $15.00 each but for this Pre-Order Sale we are practically giving them away at only $8.00 each while supplies last. Email us with the quantity you need and we will have them ready for pick-up this Saturday, September 7th between 9:00 am and noon
August 25, 2013
Leave a Comment
Organic Methods Hold Water
July 31st, 2013
The Rodale Institute celebrates the success of its 30-year Farming Systems Trial.
When rain gets scarce, we turn a tap, and water flows readily from hoses and sprinklers in yards across the nation, making it easy for us to take the resource for granted. But with climatologists predicting weather extremes in all corners of the globe in the next century, wise water use will become even more critical for all American gardeners and farmers. Hardiness zones have already changed in just the past 20 years; warm-region growing conditions are moving farther and farther north. And drier conditions are racing north, as well. Drought already costs U.S. citizens $6 billion to $8 billion a year on average, and according to a study from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, we could face extreme drought within just 30 years.
This could mean devastating crop failures, water shortages, and widespread water restrictions. With a warmer, drier environment on the horizon, turning on the hose or sprinkler to quench a thirsty garden might not be an option.
In response to the changing climate, the big three chemical-producing companies—DuPont, Monsanto, and Syngenta—are in a heated race to be the first to release a drought-tolerant variety of corn. Both genetically modified and standard-bred hybrids are in the works. They may claim feeding an ever-expanding world population as their altruistic motivation, but making millions from drought-stricken farmers makes for a lucrative incentive: Feeding the bottom line is any public corporation’s duty.
While drought-tolerant varieties are a valuable piece of the puzzle, another solution already exists—one that farmers and gardeners can practice immediately, without paying for specialized seeds. And it’s a solution that has scientific research to back it.
The Rodale Institute’s Farming Systems Trial (FST) has been tracking the performance of organically grown grain crops (such as corn and soybeans) and conventional, synthetic-chemical-reliant grain crops for the past 30 years. As America’s longest-running side-by-side comparison of these farming systems, the FST has revealed that crops grown organically are truly healthier and hardier in the long run, and better able to cope with weather extremes. Organic fields in the FST produce just as much as the chemical-reliant fields, despite claims that organic farming uses more resources to produce less food. But it is the performance of the organic fields during drought years that is truly amazing.
In four out of five drought years, the organically grown corn produced significantly more than the conventionally grown corn. The organic corn of the FST was even more successful under drought conditions than the drought-tolerant seed varieties were in the industry trials. The Rodale Institute’s organically managed fields produced between 28.4 percent and 33.7 percent more corn than conventionally managed fields under drought conditions.
Monsanto boasted that it’s genetically modified drought-tolerant corn was “one of our most significant R&D milestones,” producing between 6.7 percent and 13.4 percent more under drought conditions than other corn varieties. DuPont touts hybrids that produce 5 percent more on average, and Syngenta, which is leading the pack, has managed to produce 15 percent more with its drought-tolerant seeds.
“The organic matter in soil acts like a sponge, providing water reserves to plants during drought periods and preventing water from running off the soil surface in times of heavy rains,” says Rita Seidel, agroecologist and FST project leader at the Rodale Institute. “This organic matter has significantly increased in the FST organic fields and is actually diminishing in the conventional fields.”
Even in times of severe water shortage, not only can organic fields produce a more successful crop, but they continue to contribute to our drinking water reserves. In the FST, the organic fields recharged groundwater at rates 15 to 20 percent higher than the conventional fields.
Whether you are cultivating 40 acres or 40 square feet, compost, mulches, and cover crops create a well-balanced, fertile soil that can absorb more water, which buffers plants from drought stress. And avoiding toxic herbicides and pesticides and synthetic fertilizers keeps the community of soil microbes actively processing organic matter.
Thirty years of research proves that organic farming and gardening grows food and grows it well even during extreme weather conditions. Good news, for in the face of a warmer, drier future, the more we can rely on our soil rather than our hoses, the better off we’ll be.
So why does the FST’s organic crop outperform the chemical crop? “The current toxic-chemical approach to growing our food destroys the life of the soil with pesticides, herbicides, and high levels of inorganic fertilizers,” says Elaine Ingham, chief scientist at the Rodale Institute. “They are destroying the support system, developed by nature over the last 4 billion years, that grows healthy plants.”
That natural support system of organic practice is what makes those crops more drought-tolerant. Fertile soil, rich in organic matter and microbes, creates a more stable environment for plants. Rather than crop failure in times of stress, the organically cultivated plants can rely on the soil to provide what the weather has not.
June 6, 2013
What: 3rd Annual Fruit Tree Fundraiser
When: This Saturday only June 8th from 9am until 1 pm
Where: woodsEnd Parking lot, just north and across the road from WalMart in Edgewood
Who: Everyone is welcome
This Saturday June 8th is our 3rd annual Fruit Tree (and bush and vine) fundraiser to benefit the woodsEnd youth group’s summer camp fund. We will have a great selection of Apples, cold hardy Apricots, European and Asian Pears, Plums, Sweet and pie Cherries and several edible landscaping plant varieties. We also have Grapes, Blackberries and Raspberries, so come join us this Saturday at woodsEnd Church parking lot, just north and across the street from Walmart on Hiway 344 in Edgewood from 9am until 1pm. These trees and plants are all raised organically in the East Mountains for our conditions.